The notion of an “Indo-Pacific” region with important strategic, economic and geopolitical implications has become increasingly popular in recent years. The concept has been promoted primarily by democratic countries in the region. The first to do so was Japan, emphasizing ideas of open navigation and trade, a rules based order, connectivity and peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific.
Since the presidency of Obama, the interest of the U.S. in the region has grown, but it was under the Trump administration that the Indo-Pacific concept was fully embraced, resulting in an official strategy for the region. For the U.S., developing Indo-Pacific strategies is primarily aimed at responding to China’s growing political and economic influence in the region, and the country has looked for its regional allies to join this approach.
Although several more states and groups of countries, including the Netherlands, Australia, India, France and Germany as well as ASEAN and the EU, have indeed developed visions for the Indo-Pacific, they basically contain their own priorities and views on the region. This adds to a complexity of diverging perspectives and agendas for the Indo-Pacific.
Considering the heightened Dutch and broader European interest and focus on the Indo-Pacific region, the LeidenAsiaCentre has initiated efforts to systematically map and compare the diverging views of involved actors. This project aims to improve the understanding among the general public and policy makers in the Netherlands and Europe of the position and involvement of different countries, the issues that are at stake, and the agenda that various actors pursue.
SUBPROJECTS & REPORTS
Subproject: Transitioning Security Ordering in the Indo-Pacific – What Can India-EU Cooperation Look Like? (ongoing)
The LeidenAsiaCentre, the New Delhi-based Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS), and the Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) have embarked on a collaborative project titled, ‘Transitioning Security Ordering in the Indo-Pacific: What can India-EU Cooperation Look Like?’
Ever since the Indo-Pacific construct took off, discourse on it has witnessed steady growth. However, extant literature contains relatively limited analysis on how the construct influences transitions in regional security ordering. Shortcomings in the understanding of associated dynamics could risk the engendering of policy responses that may have inherent flaws. This policy report is an attempt to reduce the knowledge gap.
This eight-month study will develop insights and recommendations into a policy report and brief. This project aims to contribute to decision-making circles in EU and Indian policy communities by providing policy recommendations that may contribute to a stable transitioning of the Indo-Pacific’s security ordering.
Richard Ghiasy (LAC), Rajeshwari Krishnamurthy (IPCS)
Report: European Indo-Pacific Strategies in Comparative Perspective (aug 2021)
LeidenAsiaCentre researcher Matt Ferchen has written the first report in a series of publications and workshops on the topic, titled “European Indo-Pacific Strategies in Comparative Perspective“. The report discusses the origins of the growing interest in the notion of the Indo-Pacific, what a focus on this region means for European and other regions’ or countries’ China policies, and the core objectives of the European Indo-Pacific strategy as well as how this compares to the policies of other countries.